|
|||||
Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
Level of Course | 2nd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
Type of Course | Optional | ||||
Department | TURKISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (MASTER'S DEGREE) | ||||
Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
Name of Lecturer | ŞAMİL YEŞİLYURT (yesilyurt@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
Objectives of the Course | |||||
To equipt the students with basic information and abilities of literary theory and analysis |
Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
LO-1 | To be able to recognize literary theories. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-4 use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledge in their field of study. PO-5 interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-6 use the knowledge they have obtained in their field of study in order to promote the level of education, culture and arts of the society. PO-7 carry out independent studies requiring expertise related to their field of study PO-8 develop new approaches in order to solve unpredictable problems encountered in their field of study. PO-9 act as a leading role in solving problems related to their field of study, organizing personal, institutional teamworks at an expert level. PO-13 keep up with the developments in Information Technologies and make the most of it in line with their field of study. PO-14 collect data related with their field of study, review and put them in practice, checking them in the process of announcing the results and taking into consideration the scientific, cultural, artistic, social and ethical values. |
Presentation Term Paper |
LO-2 | can use the literary terms correctly. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-4 use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledge in their field of study. PO-5 interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-7 carry out independent studies requiring expertise related to their field of study PO-13 keep up with the developments in Information Technologies and make the most of it in line with their field of study. |
Presentation Term Paper |
LO-3 | Students are able to analyze text by using literary theories. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-4 use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledge in their field of study. PO-5 interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-8 develop new approaches in order to solve unpredictable problems encountered in their field of study. PO-13 keep up with the developments in Information Technologies and make the most of it in line with their field of study. |
Presentation Term Paper |
PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
Course Contents | ||
Literary terms and theories | ||
Weekly Course Content | ||
Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
1 | Introduction to course and method | Evaluation |
2 | Course on format | Giving lecture |
3 | Aristoteles | Giving lecture |
4 | Mimesis and its reflections | Giving lecture |
5 | Socialist mimesis | Giving lecture |
6 | Walter Benjamin | Giving lecture |
7 | Oral culture, written culture | Giving lecture |
8 | mid-term exam | |
9 | Bakhtin | Giving lecture |
10 | New Criticism | Giving lecture |
11 | Russian Formalists | Giving lecture |
12 | Structuralism | |
13 | Psychoanalitic criticism | Giving lecture |
14 | Jung | Giving lecture |
15 | Presentations | Sample application, Discussion method |
16 | final exam | |
Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
1 | Aristoteles. Poetika. Çev. İsmail Tunalı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1999. | |
2 | Bakhtin, Karnavaldan Romana: Edebiyat Teorisinden Dil Felsefesine Seçme Yazılar. Çev. Cem Soydemir. Yay. Haz. Mehmet Küçük. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2001. | |
3 | Benjamin, Walter. Son Bakışta Aşk. Ed. Nurdan Gürbilek. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 1990. | |
4 | Eagleton, Terry. Edebiyat Kuramı. Çev. Esen Tarım. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 1990. | |
5 | Erkman-Akerson, Fatma. Edebiyat ve Kuramlar. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları, 2010. | |
6 | Jung, Carl Gustav. Dört Arketip. Çev. Zehra Aksu Yılmazer. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2005. | |
7 | Moran, Berna. Edebiyat Kuramları ve Eleştiri. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1999. | |
8 | Ong, Walter J. Sözlü ve Yazılı Kültür: Sözün Teknolojileşmesi. Çev. Sema Postacıoğlu Banon. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2010. | |
9 | Smith, Philip. Kültürel Kuram. Çev. Selime Güzelsan ve İbrahim Gündoğdu. İstanbul: Babil Yayınları, 2005. | |
10 | Todorov, Tzvetan, ed. Yazın Kuramı: Rus Biçimcilerinin Metinleri. Çev. Mehmet Rifat ve Sema Rifat. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2005. | |
Required Course instruments and materials | ||
First and secondary print and electronic sources (articles, books, etc.), Internet-based computer, projector, board. |
Assessment Methods | |||
Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
Other assessment methods | |||
1.Oral Examination | |||
2.Quiz | |||
3.Laboratory exam | |||
4.Presentation | |||
5.Report | |||
6.Workshop | |||
7.Performance Project | |||
8.Term Paper | |||
9.Project | |||
final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
Student Work Load | |||
Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
Outside Class | |||
a) Reading | 3 | 14 | 42 |
b) Search in internet/Library | 3 | 10 | 30 |
c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 4 | 3 | 12 |
e) Term paper/Project | 5 | 6 | 30 |
Oral Examination | 0 | ||
Quiz | 0 | ||
Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
Own study for mid-term exam | 2 | 5 | 10 |
mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Own study for final exam | 2 | 6 | 12 |
final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | |||
0 | |||
Total work load; | 180 |