Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Course Catalogue
|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 2nd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | TURKISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (MASTER'S DEGREE) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | BAYRAM DURBİLMEZ (bdurbilmez@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| Comparative work of epic scope, subject, concept and basic principles of the method, epics, and knowledge about the relation of written literature. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Term differences in the type of epic, comprehend the Turkish World. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-4 use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledge in their field of study. |
Examination |
| LO-2 | Understand the structural, thematic and performance characteristics of the Turkish World epics. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-4 use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledge in their field of study. |
Examination |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| Comparative work of epic scope, subject, and the basic principles of the method, epics, and the relationship between the written literature, thematic features of epic, epic structural features, functional features of epic, epic multi-media relationship. | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | The concept of comparative epic, epic descriptions | Method of Narration |
| 2 | The terms used in the epic of the Turkish world research | Method of Narration |
| 3 | The term problem of differences | Answer question, Method of Narration |
| 4 | Structural characteristics of the Turkish epics | Answer question, Method of Narration |
| 5 | Thematic properties of the Turkish epics | Method of Narration, Discussion |
| 6 | Functional characteristics of the Turkish epics | Method of Narration, Discussion |
| 7 | Performance characteristics of the Turkish epics | Method of Narration, Discussion |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Epic performers | Method of Narration, |
| 10 | Turkish epics, in Siberia | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 11 | Epics Volga-Ural Region | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 12 | Kazakh-Kyrgyz Epics | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 13 | Uzbek Epics | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 14 | Turkmen Epics | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 15 | Final evaluation | Method of Narration |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | Çobanoğlu, Ö.Türk Dünyası Epik Destan Geleneği, Ankara 2003. | |
| 2 | K. N. Chadwick vd. Oral Epics of Central Asia. Cambridge, 1969. | |
| 3 | Şakir İbrayev. Destanın Yapısı. AKM Yay. Ankara, 1998. | |
| 4 | Karl R.Türk Boylarının Destanları. Ankara 2002. | |
| 5 | Hatto, A. (ed.) Traditions of Heroic and Epic Poetry: The Traditions. London,1980. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Books, computers, projectors, CD. | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | |||
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 7 | 7 | 49 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 4 | 7 | 28 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Own study for final exam | 7 | 5 | 35 |
| final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 180 | ||