| 
	|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 3rd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | ARKEOLOJİ (DOKTORA) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | YALÇIN KAMIŞ (yalcinkamis@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| This course aims to provide advanced knowledge about Anatolian and Mesopotamian archaeology | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Can compare Anatolian and Mesopotamin 3rd millennium BC cultures | 
			
		 
			PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-2 Can approach analytically the problems encountered in practice and theoretical work. PO-7 Ability to create and carry out projects individually. PO-11 Can use modern techniques and tools necessary for archaeological applications. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team.  | 
		 Presentation | 
	
| LO-2 | Can explain Anatolian IIIrd millennium BC cultures. | 
			
		 
			PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-5 Can make oral and written publications in accordance with scientific criteria in the field. PO-9 Solve the conservation of archaeological material and its publicity in relation to tourism and environment. PO-11 Can use modern techniques and tools necessary for archaeological applications. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team.  | 
		|
| LO-3 | Can compare Anatolian and Mesopotamin 3rd millennium BC cultures | 
			
		 
			PO-4 It can teach the knowledge and skills acquired in the field. PO-7 Ability to create and carry out projects individually. PO-9 Solve the conservation of archaeological material and its publicity in relation to tourism and environment. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology.  | 
		 Term Paper | 
	
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation  | 
	|||
| Course Contents | ||
| This course include Advanced knowledge about Anatolian and Mesopotamian archaeology | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods | 
| 1 | Introduction | Presentation | 
| 2 | Mesopotamian Chronology | Presentation | 
| 3 | Anatolian Chronology | Presentation | 
| 4 | Early State in Mesopotamia | Presentation | 
| 5 | Early State Formation in Anatolia | Presentation | 
| 6 | Mesopotamian Economy | Presentation | 
| 7 | 3rd Milllennium Economy in Anatolia | Presentation | 
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Social Structure in Mesopotamia | Presentation | 
| 10 | Social Structure in Anatolia | Presentation | 
| 11 | Material Culture İn Mesopotamia | Presentation | 
| 12 | Material Culture İn Anatolia | Presentation | 
| 13 | Anatolian and Mesopotamian Relations | Presentation | 
| 14 | Anatolian and Mesopotamian Relations | Presentation | 
| 15 | Anatolian and Mesopotamian Relations | Presentation | 
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | A. Sagona ve P.E. Zimansky, Ancient Turkey, Londra, 2009. | |
| 2 | J. Mellart, The Chalcolitihic and Early Bronze Ages in the Near east and Anatolia. Beirut, 1966. | |
| 3 | J. Yakar, Reflections of Ancient Anatolian Society in Archaeology, İstanbul, 2011. | |
| 4 | Harriet Crawford Sumer and the Sumerians. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Projection | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) | 
| mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 | 
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | |||
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 14 | 1 | 60 | 
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load | 
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 | 
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 7 | 7 | 49 | 
| b) Search in internet/Library | 7 | 7 | 49 | 
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 1 | 14 | 14 | 
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 3 | 4 | 12 | 
| mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 | 
| Own study for final exam | 3 | 4 | 12 | 
| final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 | 
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 180 | ||