|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Spring Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 2nd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | TURKISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (DOCTORATE DEGREE) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | BAYRAM DURBİLMEZ (bdurbilmez@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| Understand the Turkish mythical belief and system of thought, learn about using the mythological information in the fields of practical folklore study. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Learn about using the elements of Turkish mythology in thr field of practical folklore. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level and master level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-4 Make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate levels of qualifications. PO-7 Grasp the knowledge related to their field of study and make it public in line with the norms. |
Examination |
| LO-2 | Interpret about such as practical folklore, museums and tourism, Turkish mythology. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level and master level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-6 Carry out independent studies requiring expertise related to their field of study. PO-12 Develop new approaches in order to solve unpredictable problems encountered in their field of study. PO-13 Grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. |
Examination |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| Basic concepts of mythology, myths origins, structure and functions, relationship between mythology and the other sciences, elements of Turkish mythology, practical folklore, museum and mythology, mythology and visual presentation. | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | Myth (mythos) and mythology | Method of Narration |
| 2 | The emergence and development of myths | Method of Narration |
| 3 | Classification of myths | Source browsing |
| 4 | Myth, religion and ritual relationship | Source browsing |
| 5 | functions of myths | Method of Narration |
| 6 | Myths and cults | Method of Narration |
| 7 | Myths and Symbolism | Method of Narration |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Practical folklore | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 10 | Tourism and folklore | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 11 | Presentation of folklore | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 12 | Museums | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 13 | Use mythological symbols | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 14 | Mythology and architecture | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 15 | Mythology and advertising, cinema | Method of Narration, Article review. |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | Ögel, Bahaeddin, Türk Mitolojisi I-II, TTK Yay., Ankara 1993. | |
| 2 | Eliade, Mircae, Mitlerin Özellikleri, çev. Sema Rifat, Simavi Yay., İstanbul 1993. | |
| 3 | Roux, Jean Paul, Türklerin ve Moğolların Eski Dini, çev. Aykut Kazancıgil, İstanbul 1998 | |
| 4 | Campbell, Joseph, Yaratıcı Mitoloji, Tanrıların Maskeleri, çev. K. Emiroğlu, İmge yayınları, Ankara 1994. | |
| 5 | Öcal Oğuz. (2002). Küreselleşme ve Uygulamalı Halkbilimi, Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Books, computers, projectors, CD. | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | |||
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 5 | 14 | 70 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 6 | 7 | 42 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 6 | 6 | 36 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 5 | 4 | 20 |
| mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Own study for final exam | 8 | 5 | 40 |
| final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 210 | ||